<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 2010 Wave Panther 2</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ezzy.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-644</guid> <description>thanks for asking.  Good question.  Some years, I feel like the improvements made in the sail are small.  Other years, the improvements are immediately easy to spot.  Based on global feedback I&#039;ve been receiving all year, the &#039;11 sails are lighter and more stable than the &#039;10 (and the &#039;09).  If you go back 5 years, there have been one or two huge improvements.  One of the biggest leaps forward was the transition from &#039;07 to &#039;08.  The other big improvement has been in using more of the white &quot;Tri-Lite&quot; fabric which makes the heads of the sails so much lighter.  We&#039;re really not a &quot;hype&quot; company.  We rely on word of mouth and the product 100% to maintain our reputation.  I think the product speaks for itself!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for asking.  Good question.  Some years, I feel like the improvements made in the sail are small.  Other years, the improvements are immediately easy to spot.  Based on global feedback I&#8217;ve been receiving all year, the &#8217;11 sails are lighter and more stable than the &#8217;10 (and the &#8217;09).  If you go back 5 years, there have been one or two huge improvements.  One of the biggest leaps forward was the transition from &#8217;07 to &#8217;08.  The other big improvement has been in using more of the white &#8220;Tri-Lite&#8221; fabric which makes the heads of the sails so much lighter.  We&#8217;re really not a &#8220;hype&#8221; company.  We rely on word of mouth and the product 100% to maintain our reputation.  I think the product speaks for itself!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seadiver</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-643</link> <dc:creator>Seadiver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-643</guid> <description>hey guys
i love my 5 qm ezzy wave panther from 09, just curious, putting all the hype aside, i already know ezzy is one of the very best sails, what are main design changes compared to ezzys wave sails say from five years ago? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guys<br
/> i love my 5 qm ezzy wave panther from 09, just curious, putting all the hype aside, i already know ezzy is one of the very best sails, what are main design changes compared to ezzys wave sails say from five years ago?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-349</guid> <description>thank you for the message.  The sizing of the sails should line up with your traditional reasoning.  Our target, say, for a 4.7, is to make that sail feel absolutely wonderful for 4.7 conditions.  David Ezzy has a different design philosophy than other sail makers with regards to shaping.  It truly might be best for you to chat with him on the telephone to explain things in detail.  His direct number is 808 575-2566.Regarding 4.7 Gaastra power vs. Ezzy power, I would select the same size sail but know that you might need a minute to learn how to tune for conditions on the Ezzy.  One nice thing you can count on is that you can scale your future sail purchases with bigger jumps between sizes.  Virtually all sail brands have worked on enhancing tuning range.  In other words, instead of going from 4.7 to a 5.2 you can now consider going from a 4.7 to a 5.5.  From a 4.7 down you can consider going to a 4.0.Hope this helps!  Do you have an Ezzy dealer near you?  Perhaps we could help arrange a demo.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for the message.  The sizing of the sails should line up with your traditional reasoning.  Our target, say, for a 4.7, is to make that sail feel absolutely wonderful for 4.7 conditions.  David Ezzy has a different design philosophy than other sail makers with regards to shaping.  It truly might be best for you to chat with him on the telephone to explain things in detail.  His direct number is 808 575-2566.</p><p>Regarding 4.7 Gaastra power vs. Ezzy power, I would select the same size sail but know that you might need a minute to learn how to tune for conditions on the Ezzy.  One nice thing you can count on is that you can scale your future sail purchases with bigger jumps between sizes.  Virtually all sail brands have worked on enhancing tuning range.  In other words, instead of going from 4.7 to a 5.2 you can now consider going from a 4.7 to a 5.5.  From a 4.7 down you can consider going to a 4.0.</p><p>Hope this helps!  Do you have an Ezzy dealer near you?  Perhaps we could help arrange a demo.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Duarte</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link> <dc:creator>Duarte</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-346</guid> <description>Hi ezzy team,I&#039;m thinking about buying some ezzy sails wave panther. But I don&#039;t know which sizes are more adequate.I&#039;m used to more conventional sails wich have a different design philosophy and are rather flat, and I saw some ezzy sails on the beach and I noticed the deep pre-shape.
So I guess when the wind blows into the sail, the ezzy maintains her shape, while other brands sails just fills with the wind and form her own shape.Now my question is if the ezzy sails is more powerful than other brand sails because of the pre-shape?So for example a gaastra manic 4,7m is equal to which size in the ezzy wave panther range (in terms of power)? 4,2? 4,5? 4,7?I&#039;m 68 kg, 1m77.Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ezzy team,</p><p>I&#8217;m thinking about buying some ezzy sails wave panther. But I don&#8217;t know which sizes are more adequate.</p><p>I&#8217;m used to more conventional sails wich have a different design philosophy and are rather flat, and I saw some ezzy sails on the beach and I noticed the deep pre-shape.<br
/> So I guess when the wind blows into the sail, the ezzy maintains her shape, while other brands sails just fills with the wind and form her own shape.</p><p>Now my question is if the ezzy sails is more powerful than other brand sails because of the pre-shape?</p><p>So for example a gaastra manic 4,7m is equal to which size in the ezzy wave panther range (in terms of power)? 4,2? 4,5? 4,7?</p><p>I&#8217;m 68 kg, 1m77.</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-329</guid> <description>thank you for the message Evan.  The Ezzy mast system requires that the bottom length never be longer than the tip.  The 430 tip + 400 bottom is the ideal set up!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for the message Evan.  The Ezzy mast system requires that the bottom length never be longer than the tip.  The 430 tip + 400 bottom is the ideal set up!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Evan</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link> <dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-328</guid> <description>Hi all!I have a question regarding the 5.2 Panther2. I have both complete Ezzy rdm 400 &amp; 430 sets. What would be the suggested best combination - The 430cm top and base or 400 base &amp; 430 top? Is there any performance hit by choosing one over the other?Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all!</p><p>I have a question regarding the 5.2 Panther2. I have both complete Ezzy rdm 400 &amp; 430 sets. What would be the suggested best combination &#8211; The 430cm top and base or 400 base &amp; 430 top? Is there any performance hit by choosing one over the other?</p><p>Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-310</guid> <description>yes, you should be good!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, you should be good!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-309</guid> <description>Problem solved, found a second hand Ezzy 400 locally.  Its a 2004/5 mast which as far as I can tell looks identical to the new models- that&#039;s going to work fine with a 2010 Wavepanther 2 right??   (you can delete my similar and yet to be posted comment)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem solved, found a second hand Ezzy 400 locally.  Its a 2004/5 mast which as far as I can tell looks identical to the new models- that&#8217;s going to work fine with a 2010 Wavepanther 2 right??   (you can delete my similar and yet to be posted comment)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-308</guid> <description>Sorted, found an Ezzy 400 for sail locally! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorted, found an Ezzy 400 for sail locally!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: joe Cheung</title><link>http://www.ezzy.com/sails/2010-sails/2010-wave-panther-2/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link> <dc:creator>joe Cheung</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezzy.com/?page_id=125#comment-307</guid> <description>What a wonderful sail, I have been playing windsurfing for more than twenty year, just buy a 5.5 from the HK dearler  SO GOOD</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful sail, I have been playing windsurfing for more than twenty year, just buy a 5.5 from the HK dearler  SO GOOD</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/27 queries in 0.282 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.ezzy.com @ 2012-02-10 07:18:12 -->
